Case Study
June 2019

Biomass Analysis

Date: 2019-2022

Overview

We explored the climate and financial impacts of biomass power plants. Our focus was on whether switching from coal to biomass could genuinely benefit the climate. The results showed that these benefits are minimal, especially compared to investing in alternative energy sources. The biomass supply chain is hard to scale and not cost-effective for reducing emissions or generating energy.

Key findings

Our research has been widely cited by advocates working to halt the expansion of biomass energy. Our economic predictions were proven correct when Enviva, a leading wood pellet producer, declared bankruptcy. The biomass industry has since struggled to secure investments, particularly in the U.S. and Europe.

Lessons learned

New energy technologies often gain political support, even when they lack economic, social, or environmental justification. It's crucial for experts to have a stronger voice in determining which energy projects deserve backing.

Partners

  • Pivot Point

Funder

  • Packard Foundation

Other case studies

June 6, 2021

Mission Climate Project

June 6, 2023

Transition Minerals

June 6, 2016

Landscope and Riverscope

Get in touch

Ready to tackle complex challenges? Get in touch to explore how TMP can support your goals.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.